That was not exactly an unannouced blogging break. It's just that Congress has been so distressing, and the news has been so same-ol' same-ol' that it was depressing to consider making comments. I've been making short ones elsewhere on the web, notably at The Sideshow, Whateveresque, The Mockingbird's Medley and assorted other places. But I really have just had no heart to discuss how miserably the Democrats have been rolling over.
The one news item that really annoyed me was the Ahmadinejad at Columbia stuff. Look, Columbia has a largely Jewish student body. Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust denier. The combination was a little predictable, except that introducing a speaker by insulting him is the rankest form of bad behavior -- the President could at least have waited until Ahmadinejad was a bad guest before being a bad host. It was a perfectly crappy thing for the representative of a University to do.
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The President of Columbia was scared. He was scared that if he did not sufficiently and vehemently express the "common wisdom" as told to him by the press regarding Ahmadinejad, he would be hounded from his office, shunned as a "flake" or "kook", eventually to be wandering the streets in a bathrobe and fuzzy slippers asking people "brother, can you spare some change?". The fear was almost visceral on his face as he did what he felt he had to do to keep from being destroyed by the howling masses of brownshirts who enforce political heterodoxy in the United States. So yeah, it was bad manners. But scared people rarely are too concerned about manners, unless they're useful in staying alive, which in this case was not applicable.
- Badtux the not-fearful Penguin
Hey, once we've managed to set right a good number of the things we've done wrong over the last six-odd years, then I'll start worrying about the consequences of bad manners. Columbia's dean made no impression on me whatsoever. People who worry over bad manners in these uncertain and threatening times don't appear to give much of a damn about making them less threatening and uncertain. There is a word for these miscreants: Republicans...
I'm not sure that's at all true, Jim. Nothing compelled Columbia to invite a speaker who was so antithetical to what they stand for. Like the rest of the USA they could have ignored the visit.
You are right in calling Republicans "miscreants" -- those who aren't downright and outright criminals elected those who are -- and they have much to answer for.
Post a Comment